Äàòà: 2009-04-03 22:14
??????????????????? ???????????????????: ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ? ??????????????????? ???????????????

?.?. ?????????, ?.?. ??????

???????? ??????????? ??. ?.?. ????????? ??? ???????, ?. ????;
??????????? ??????-???????????? ??????????? “????????” ?? ?? “????????????”



??????? ??????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????? [1, 2]. ?????? ?? ??????? ????????? ???????????, ??????? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? (??????? ????????????? – 0,3–1,1 %), ???????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ???????? ? ???????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? [13, 35]. ??? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ????? ? ???????? ????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????. ? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????????? (????) ?????????? ?????????????, ??????????? ? ????????????? ??????????????? ??????????? ? ???????? ???????. ???????? ?? ??, ??? ??????????????????? ??????????? ???????????? ????? ? ????????? ???? ???????? ??????????????????? ??????????? ? ?? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????????? ???????? ????? ???????? ?????????, ???? ?? ??? ??? ?????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ???????????? [4, 7, 20, 24, 31].

???????? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ???? ? ??????????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ????????? ??????????? ????? [14, 18, 29, 30]. ? ??????? ??????????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ???? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????????????, ? ????? ????????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??? ???????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ??????. ????????, ???? ?????????? ????????????? ????????????? ? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ? ????????????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????? (50 % ? ??????).

? ????. 1 ???????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ??? ?????????? ???? ? ????? ??????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????. ? ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ????, ??????????? ??? ?????? ????????????? 2D ???? ? ???????? ???????? ???????, ???????? ?????????????? ??????????: ???????????????? ? ????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????????? 90 ? 92 % [17]. ? ?????? ??????? [22, 23] ??? ?????? ?? ????? ?????????????, ? ???????????????? ? ????????????? ????????? ?????????????? 40–85 ? 37–97 %.



????? ???????, ?????? ??????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ???????????????????? ??????????? ??????????? ?????, ?????? ?? ???????? ???????? ????????????? ? ????? ????????? ????????????? ????????? ???????? ???????. ?????? ?????? 3D-?????????? ? ??????????????? “??????” ? ?????????????? ? ???????? ?? ???? ??????? ????????????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ????????????????? (38 %) ? ?????????? ??????? ?????????????? (95 %) [23]. ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ??????? ???????????????? ? ????????????? ???????? ???? ?????????????? ?? 65–90 ? 70–95 % [14, 18, 29, 30]. ?????? ? ???? ??????? ????????????? ???????? ???? ?????????? ? ???????? ?????? ???????? (54–60 %), ? ? ????? ???????????? ???????? ?????? ???????????????? – 50 % [10, 19, 36]. ?????? ? ????? ???????, ? ?????? ????????????? ?????????? ????????????? ? ??????????????? “??????” ????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ?? ???????????? ??????? ?????????????? ?????? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????????????. ??? ????????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????? ? ????????????? ????????? ???????????????? ? ????????????? ???? ??? ????????? ????????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????? ??????????? ????? ?????????? ?????????????? 65–75 ? 82–93 % [3, 16]. ? ????????????? ????????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????????? 3D ???? ??????????????????? ???????????? ? ????????????? ?????????. ? ???? ????????????? (????????????? [33] ? ?????????????? [15]) ?? ???????????? ??????? ????????? (????? 100 ? ??????) ???????????? ????? ?????? ????????????????????? ???????????????? ? ????????????? – ?????????????? 83–88 ? 86–91 %. ?????????? ?????? ???? ????????????, ??????????? ?????? ???????????????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????, ?? ?????? ????????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ??????????? ??????? [26] – ???????????????? ???????? 94 % ?? ???? ?????????? ???????? ????????????? (57 %).

??? ????????????? ???????????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ????????????? ? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????: ?????? ????? ???????? ???????, ???????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ???????? ???????, ????????? ????? ????? ???????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????? ???????. ?????????? 3D-?????????? ???? ? ????????????? ????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ??????????, ????? ??? ??????????????? ????? ????????? ???????? ??????? ? ??????? ????????? 5–6 ??, ??? ???????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ???????? ??????? ? ??? ?????? ???????? ??????? – ?????????????? 2–4 ? 7–8 ?? [15, 33]. ????????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????, ?????? ???????????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ?? ????????????? ?????????. ????? ???????, ???????? ??????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????????, ??? ? ?????? ???????, ??? ? ? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ????? ? ?? ?????????? ? ??????? ?????, ?? ?????????? ??????? ???????????.

??? ???? ? ???????????? ?? ???????????? ??? ???? ?????????? ?????? ???????? ? ??????????????? ???????? (50 % ? ??????) ???????? ??????? ??????????? ?????. ?????????? ????????, ??? ?????????? ????????? ??????? (3D ????????? ? ????????????? ?????????, 3D ????????? ? ??????????????? “??????” ? 3D ??????????? ???????????? ??? ??????????? ???????) ????????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????? (? ??????? 80 %) ???????? ??????? ? 80 % ?????? ?? ???????????? ? ?????????????? 80 % ??????? ? ??????????? ???????? ?????? (“??????? 80 %”) [24]. ??????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ??? ???? ????????? ???????? ????????????? ????????? ???????? ???????, ?????? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????? ????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????.



??????? ??????????? ??????????? ??????? ??? ????????? ??????? ?????????????? ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??????????????? ?????? ? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ????????? ??? ????????????? ?????????? (“??????-???????????”) ?????????????????? ???? ? ?????? ?????????? (???-??????????) ? ???????? ???????????? ??????? [21, 27]. ??? ???? ????? ???? ?????????? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ?????, ????????? ?????? ?????????, ???????? ?????? ? ????????? ???????????????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????, ?? ??????? ????????? ??????? ??? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????. ????????, ??? ? ?????????????? ???????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ????????????????? ????? ?? ???????? ????????? ????????? ???? ? ?????? ?????????????? ?? 60–85 % [9]. ?????????? ??????????? ???? ? ?????????? ??? ????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ????????????? ? ?????????????? ???????? ???????, ? ?? ????? ??? ???????????? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ????????? [34]. ??? ??????????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????? ????????? ????? ????????????? ? ????????? ??????????? ??????? (????????? ???????? ????????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ???????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????).

? ??????????? ????????????? ????????????? ???????? ?????????????? ??????????? ? ?????? ??????????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ???? ? ?????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ????? [28]. ? ?????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ??????????? ????????? ? ????????? ? ??????????????? ?????? ? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ?????????? ????????? ????????????????????? [11]. ??? ???? ????????, ??? ? 15 (?? 17) ????????? ? ????? ??????????? ??????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ????????????? ???????????????? (50 % ? ??????) ???????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ???????????????? (82 %) ? ????????????? (100 %) ??????. ?????????? ????????, ??? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ? ??????? ??????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????, ??? ??????? ??????????? ????????????????? ?????? ????????.

? ????? ????????, ?????????????? ??????? ??????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ??????????? ???????, ??????? ??????? ???????????? ????????? ???????? ??????/???, ? ????? – ?????????? ? ????????????????? ?????????? ???????????????????? ???????????. ????? ????, ??????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????????? ?? ???????????? ??????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????? ? ?? ? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????????? ?????????????? ????????? ???????????.

? ????????? ???? ???????? ???????? ????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ??????????????????? ???????? “??????????” ????????/?????. ? ??????? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? (??? ?????????? “????????????” ????????? ???????????? [25, 33]) ??????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ? ????????? ???????? ??????/??? ? ??????? ??????????????????? ?????. ???????? “????????????” ????????????, ??????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ??????????? ?? ????????????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ????????, ???????? ???????? SMASH (simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics – ???????? ?????????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ????????) [5, 6] ? SENSE (sensitive encoding technique – ???????? ??????????? ???????????????? ???????????) [38]. ???????? ???? “????????????” ???????????? ??????????? ? ????????????? ? ??????????? ?????????, ??? ????????? ???????, ??? ? ???? ?? ??????????? ??????? ????????. ??????? ??????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ? ???? ??????? ????????? ? ???????? “???”. ? ??????? ??????? SENSE ? SMASH ????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ????? ????? ????????, ??????????? ? ??? ?????????? ?????????????? ????????? ????, ? ????? ????? ???????????????? ????????????? ???? (? ?????) “???????” ???????? ??????, ??????????? ????? [12, 37].

???????? ???????? SENSE ?????? “???????” ?????? ?????????? ????????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? “K-????????????”, ??????? ???????????? (?? ???? ??????????? ??????????) ??????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ????? ?????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????. ??? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ????????????? ?????? ? ???????? ?????????? ???????????????? ??? ?????????? (????????) ????????????? ???????????, ??? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???????? ???????????????? ?????????? ???? [37].

? ??????? ???????? SMASH – ???????????????? ????????????? ???????????????????? ??????????? (?? ?????? ????????????? ?????????? ???? (????????, “???????”) ???????? ? ??????? K-???????????? ? ???????????? ????????????? ?????-??????????????) – ??????????? ?????????????? ??????????????????? ??????????? ??????? ??????????? ????? [32, 38].

? ????? ????? ???????, ??? ????? ????????????? ?????? ???? ? ??????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ??????????????????? ??????????. ???????? ???? ????? ????? ? ??????? ?????????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ????????? ???????? ???????.

??????????
???????? ?.?., ???????? ?.?., ??????? ?.?. ????????-??????????? ?????????? ?????? ? ???????. – ?: ?????, 1997. – 144 ?.
Barkhansen J., Hunold P., Waltering K.U. MRI in coronary arterydisease // Eur. Radiol. – 2004. – Vol. 14, ? 12. – P. 2155-2162.
Bunce N.H., Jhooti P., Keegan J. et al. Evaluation of free-breathing three-dimensional MR-coronary angiography with hybrid ordered phase encoding (HOPE) for the detection of proximal coronary artery stenoses // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. – 2001. – Vol. 14. – P. 677-684.
Bunce N.H., Keegan J., Gatehouse P.D. et al. Initial experience with the intravascular contrast agent NC 1001 50-injection (“Clariscan”) for breathe-hold and navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. – 2002. – Vol. 16. – P. 217-223.
Bydder M., Larkman D.J., Hainay J.V. Generalized SMASH imaging // Magn. Reson. Med. – 2002. – Vol. 47. – P. 160-170.
Bydder M., Atkison D., Larkman D.J. et al. SMASH navigators // Magn. Reson. Med. – 2003. – Vol. 49. – P. 493-500.
Danias P.G., Stuber M., Botnar R.M. et al. Coronary MR angiography clinical applications and potential for imaging coronary artery disease // Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. Nort Amer. – 2003. – Vol. 11, ? 1. – P. 81-99.
Duerinchx A.J., Urman M.K. Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography analysis of initial clinical results // Radiology. – 1994. – Vol. 193. – P. 731-738.
Gould K.L., Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance // Amer. J. Cardiology. – 1974. – Vol. 34. – P. 48-55.
Huber A., Nikolaou K., Gonschior P. et al. Navigator-echo-based respiratory gating for three-dimensional MR coronary angiography results form healthy volunteers and patients with proximal coronary artery stenoses // Amer. J. Roentgenol. – 1999. – Vol. 173. – P. 95-101.
Hundley W.G., Hillis L.D. Assessment of coronary arteries restenosis with phase-contrast MRI measurement of coronary flow reserve // Circulation. – 2000. – Vol. 101. – P. 2375-2381.
Jacob P.M., Griswold M.A., Edelman R.R. et al. Accelerated cardiac imaging using the SMASH technique // J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. – 1999. – Vol. 1. – P. 153-157.
Katus H.A. Unique complication during coronary angiography: peripheral embolism by selective right coronary engagement // Angiology. – 2001. – Vol. 52. – P. 493-499.
Kessler W., Achenbach S., Moshage W. et al. Usefulness of respiratory gated MR coronary angiography in assessing narrowings ?50 % in diameter in native coronary arteries and in aortocoronary bypass conduits // Amer. J. Cardiology. – 1997. – Vol. 80. – P. 989-993.
Kim W.Y., Danias P.G., Stuber M. et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses // New Engl. J. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 345. – P. 1863-1869.
Lethimonnier F., Furber A., Morel O. et al. Three-dimensional coronary artery MR imaging using prospective real-time respiratory navigator and linear phase shift processing: comparison with conventional coronary angiography // Magn. Reson. Imaging. – 1999. – Vol. 17. – P. 1111-1120.
Manning W.J., Li D., Edelman R.A. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography // New Engl. J. Med. – 1993. – Vol. 328. – P. 828-832.
Mueller M.F., Freisch M., Kroeker R.M. et al. Proximal coronary artery stenosis: three-dimensional MRI with fat saturation and navigator echo // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. – 1997. – Vol. 7. – P. 644-651.
Nikolaou K., Huber A., Knez A. et al. Navigator echo-based respiratory gating for three-dimensional MR coronary angiography // J. Cat. – 2001. – Vol. 25. – P. 378-387.
Nikolaon K., Poon M., Sirol M. et al. Complementary results of computed tomography and MRI of heart and coronary arteries // Cardiol. Clin. – 2003. – Vol. 21. – ? 4. – P. 639-655.
Nitatori T., Yokoyama K., Hachiya J. Evaluation of coronary flow using MR angiography // Nippon Rinsho. – 1997. – Vol. 55 (Suppl. 1). – P. 638-640.
Pennell D.J., Bogren H.G., Keegan J. et al. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging // Heart. – 1996. – Vol. 73. – P. 127-133.
Post J.C., van Rossum A.C., Hofmann M.B. et al. Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detection coronary artery disease // Eur. Heart J. – 1997. – Vol. 18. – P. 426-433.
Philippe F. Invasive angiography, CT or MRI for coronary imaging // Ann. Cardiol. Angiol. – 2004. – Vol. 53, ? 2. – P. 79-90.
Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Scheidegger M.B. et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI // Magn. Reson. Med. – 1999. – Vol. 42. – P. 952-962.
Regenfus M., Ropers D., Achenbach S. et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography // J. Amer. Coll. Cardiology. – 2000. – Vol. 36. – P. 44-50.
Sakuma H., Takeda K., Nakagawa T. Assessment of coronary flow reserve using fast phase contrast cine MR imaging // Nippon. Rinsh. – 1997. – Vol. 55, ? 7. – P. 1833-1838.
Sakuma H., Koskenvuo J.W., Niemi P. et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve using fast velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation study using Positron Emission Tomography // Amer. J. Roentgenol. – 2000. – Vol. 175. – P. 1029-1033.
Sandstede J., Pabst T., Beer M., Gies N. Three-dimensional MR coronary angiography using Navigator technique Compared with conventional coronary angiography // Amer. J. Roentgenol. – 1999. – Vol. 172. – P. 135-139.
Sardanelli F., Molinari G., Zandrino F. et al. Three-dimensional, navigator-echo MR coronary angiography in detection stenoses of the major epicardial vessels // Radiology. – 2000. – Vol. 214. – P. 808-814.
Serfaty J.M. Progress in cardiovascular interventional MRI // J. Radiol. – 2003. – Vol. 84. – P. 1945-1951.
Sodickson D.K., Manning W.J. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays // Magn. Reson. Med. – 1997. – Vol. 38. – P. 591-603.
Sommer T., Hofer U., Hackenbroch M. et al. Hochanfl?sende 3d-MR-korona angiographie in echt-zeit navigatortechnik // Fortschr. Rontgenstr. – 2002. – Vol. 174. – P. 459-466.
Uren N.G., Melin J.A., De Bruyne B. et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis // New Engl. J. Med. – 1994. – Vol. 330. – P. 1782-1788.
Vano E., Goicolea J., Culvan G. et al. Institution skin radiation injures in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures // Brit. J. Radiol. – 2001. – Vol. 74. – P. 1023-1031.
Van Geuns R.J., de Bruin H.G., Rensing B.J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries: clinical results from the three-dimensional evaluation of a respiratory gates technique // Heart. – 1999. – Vol. 82. – P. 515-519.
Weiger M., Preussmann K.P. Specific coil design for SENSE: A six-element cardiac array // Magn. Reson. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 45. – P. 495-504.
Weiger M., Preussmann K.P., Boesiger P. 2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI // MAGMA. – 2002. – Vol. 14. – ? 1. – P. 10-19.

Íàâåðõ ñòðàíèöû